Can we implement a prototype demonstration of diversified voting and flexible funding for one challenge fund?
This is the total amount allocated to Prototype Diversified Voting Method.
Prior to implementing a modification to the Cardano Catalyst voting mechanism, a trial is necessary to test the proposed recommendations.
25% of the voting wallets participate in the prototype vote.
The results demonstrate important differences in selected projects.
* Was the outcome of the vote substantially different from the current method?
* If the outcome was different, what was the measurable influence of smaller sized wallets?
* Did the flexible funding capability influence the selection of awarded projects?
* Are there any detectable security risks with this rebalanced influence?
* How did the participation in the prototype vote compare with the current Cardano Catalyst voting?
Proposed Objectives
* Execute a demonstration vote using square-root, quadratic, or related generalizations of these weighted voting methods.
* Allow for a flexible funding award so that high-quality projects are not eliminated by small differences in the proposed and available budget.
* Provide evidence for evaluation of the effectiveness of the weighted voting to:
a) Provide a balanced influence across cohorts of wealth
b) Increase the participation in the Cardano Catalyst voting process
c) Provide flexibility in deciding on the funding level for projects
Methodology
Required: